Homegroup certainly make home networking easier, especially when the PC is part of a domain as well, it just works. No more fiddling with rights between home accounts and domain users.
Since the upgrade of my Media Center PC to Windows 7 I have had a few problems with fast forward on recorded TV and DVDs (which I had not seen on Vista). It was as if the fast forward button on my remote got jammed on and I could not go back to standard playback easily, it took a few seconds for the message to get through, then you ended up back where you started.
I decided it was probably a CPUprocessing speed issue, so upgrade my 3 year old AMD/ASUS single core motherboard to a current entry level dual core system, a MSI motherboard and Intel E5300 Dual Core (the brand choice was just down to what was cheap and in stock at my local supplier). This fixed the issue completely, but did require a reinstall of Windows 7, as the Intel Dual Core needed a different HAL to the AMD single core. However the reinstall was not a major issue as I run a dedicated PC as a Media Center and it is practically a default installation,
A webcast recording of SQLBits IV session ‘Making the SQL developer one of the family with Visual Studio Team System’ is now available on the SQLBits site. This discusses the features of the VS2008 Database GDR Edition.
Unfortunately I will not be proposing a session for this years SQLBits community event on the 21st of November 2009 at Celtic Manor in Newport, as I will be travelling back from the Microsoft PDC in LA
Thanks to those people who attended my sessions at Epicenter yesterday in Dublin. For hose who asked you can find copies of the presentation at the Black Marble web site.
I was at an interesting meeting at my local BCS branch tonight ‘Opening The Black Box: An Introduction to Quality Driven Development’ by Tim Hunter. I had heard of TDD and DDD etal. but QDD was new to me.
What we got was a hour framed by the basic premise that ‘Waterfall is good – Agile is bad’ (or progressive methods as the speaker called anything that was not waterfall). As another attendee pointed out in the Q&A, this tone in the presentation tended to cloud the more balanced points, managing to get the backs up of a good few attendees by the speaker’s seeming lack of understanding of god agile practices. He seemed to see agile as developers messing around, no documentation, testing or general engineering discipline. He argued that without waterfall, and specifically quality gates, we could not write quality systems. This is not the Agile I know.
Agile, if adopted properly is very constraining from an engineering point of view. We have detailed specification by example, open reporting practices, regular re-estimation of remaining work, test driven development, pair programming, automated builds, regular potentially shippable products with quality gates to move products between states of publication so we don’t just release everything we build. The list goes on and on; OK no team is going to use it all, but the tools are there in the tool box. A team can set where on the agility spectrum they choose to sit.
I agree with the sessions premise that quality gates are important, but not that waterfall is the only way to enforce them. You can put the whole methodology choice aside and frame the discussion in how do we get staff who take pride in their work and are empowered produce quality products via their working environment. I would argue there is more hope for this in an agile framework where the whole team buys into the ethos of software craftsmanship, as opposed to any methodology where an onerous procedure is imposed, a system must be habitable as Alistair Cockburn puts it.
I felt the session was too pessimistic over the quality of people in our industry. The speaker wanting to make rules because he perceived people were of low quality and had to be forced to do a half way decent job. OK I am a bit pessimistic, not too bad a trait for a developer or tester, but we have to hope for more, to strive for more. This is something I think the agile community does do, they are trying to write better software and become better craftsman everyday. They care.
For me the key question is how can we bring more people along with us. Especially the people who have given up and just turn up to do their IT related job and avoid as much hassle as possible. They are the ones who don’t turn up to the BSC, community conference or any user groups or even read a book or blog on the subject. What can we do for them?
I have just attended an excellent free webinar session on ASP.NET testing with Ivonna and Typemock by Gil Zilberfeld of Typemock and Artem Smirnov creator of Ivonna a Typemock add-on for unit testing ASP.NET
The session is being repeated today at 2pm GMT and I understand a recording will appear on the Typemock site in due course.
So if you get a chance this afternoon have look, it is well worth your time if you work in the ASP.NET space. Personally I have also found Ivonna useful for Sharepoint testing too, watch the session it might give you some ideas.
Doron at Typemock has posted a nice description of how they use Kanban for managing support. A good introduction for those unfamiliar with lean
There was a good deal of chat in how Typemock could be used for more general ASP.NET testing; if this is of interest to you I would strongly recommended Typemock’s next webinar on the 25th of August on Unit testing ASP.NET with Isolator and Ivonna
Cool, I just noticed that on Windows 7 Media Center with a Hauppauge Nova 500 T Tuner card the red button works; so at last I can get Digital Teletext and interactive channels on the BBC without having to know their actual channel numbers (and as I remember they were actually ignored by previous versions of Media Center without a registry hack anyway).
This makes using MCE just like a standard Digital TV – should help general acceptance. This has certainly improved since the older versions.