Chapters 4 and 5 of the book have now been made available for early access. Chapter 4 – Saying nothing with nullable types Nullable types depend heavily on generics (described in chapter 3) and require both language and runtime changes. In this chapter I explore the problem they solve, the types involved (including runtime changes) and the C# changes (int? meaning Nullable<int> and the various operators and conversions available). I also cover a couple of uses of nullable types which haven’t necessarily hit the mainstream, but can prove useful – the comparisons I wrote about in this blog a little … Continue reading C# in Depth: Chapters 4 and 5 now available in MEAP
I’m delighted to announce my association with Iterative Training, a new .NET training company in the UK. It’s been founded by a colleague of mine and his girlfriend, and ran its first course earlier in the year – a WCF Master Class taught by Juval Löwy of IDesign. As you can tell from its starting point, Iterative Training is dedicated to providing really top notch training from genuine experts. Where do I fit in? Well, I’m promoting the company on my website (the GoogleAds are now replaced with course adverts – but still without getting in the way of the … Continue reading Announcement: Partnership with Iterative Training
Just a quickie while I remember. A pet peeve of mine has surfaced again recently, while reading some CVs. Java, the programming language, is just written “Java”. It’s not an acronym. There’s no need to write it as “JAVA”. That just looks shouty and somewhat silly. Why do so many people get it wrong? While we’re at it, why does it irritate me so much to see it written the wrong way?
Finally, I can properly talk about what I’ve been working on for about the last 6 months. The book I’ve been writing is called “C# in Depth” and it’s being published by Manning (just like Groovy in Action was). It’s about C# 2 and 3, and pretty much just C# 2 and 3. In particular, it’s aimed at people who already know C# 1 at least reasonably well. I believe there are plenty of people who are comfortable with C# 1 but either don’t know C# 2 at all or are familiar with it but have gaps in their experience. It’s for … Continue reading Announcing "C# in Depth"
Here’s a situation I ran into a while ago, and will no doubt run into many, many times in the future: I implement a web service (in .NET 2.0) I add a web reference in another project I make calls to the web service I want to be able to test those calls, and how the client will react to different results Now, this is an ideal situation for mocks or stubs – except that the proxy code generated by Visual Studio (or rather, wsdl.exe) doesn’t include an interface, which makes it trickier to mock. (I can’t remember whether the … Continue reading How does everyone else mock web services?
Some of you may know that I don’t do a lot of user interface work. Well, in the last couple of weeks I’ve been doing little but user interface work. I thought it might be time to share a few reflections. Designers The designer in VS 2005 is actually very good – for a designer. It still has its “thou shalt not touch this bit of code” which of course you then have to touch in order to include some controls which aren’t in the toolbox, but overall it’s pretty reasonable. I particularly like the “GenerateMember” property it uses to … Continue reading Writing user interfaces