C# and VB.NET

I don’t like to think of myself as a “C# Developer”. I prefer to think of myself as a “.NET Developer”, mainly because C# is not the only tool I know how to use. However, I primarily use C# as a language of choice because that’s the majority of what most .NET developers use, and I never had a reason to know or understand VB.NET. It’s not to say I was clueless about VB.NET, I’ve glanced at the syntax and I felt that it was similar enough to C# that I didn’t really need to get into the dirty details. Nor do I want to spend the time on comparing the two. There have been countless blog posts on that already.

Now, I chose to write a Compact Framework Application in VB.NET. Some of my co-workers looked at me like I was nuts. That’s one thing I really never got: Why does the general C# crowd hate VB.NET? When I say hate, I mean hate. That’s at least the sense I get from them. I’ve asked, and one such answer was “It’s too wordy and verbose,” but does that really qualify hating it?

Now I ask those C# developers, can you, with a pen and a paper and no references, write a property in VB.NET? How about class with a generic? Maybe a generic with multiple type constraints? Subscribing to an event? You can see where I am going with this. I had an experience where I did a one day bit of consulting to someone helping them port a .NET 1.1 application to the latest stuff. It went smoother than they expected once I explained the difference between a “Web Site” and a “Web Application”. They had some time to ask me, “What’s new in VB.NET?”


Well, there is generics of course, but I struggled to remember syntaxes. Simple things, like a property. Also, the editor for VB.NET is slightly different with how it handles intellisense completion, so I botched that a few times. It was rather embarrassing. I decided at that time there was zero excuse for me, as a consultant, to not know VB.NET as well as I know C#. To do this the most effective way possible, I needed to write a real application in it.

I’m comfortable with VB.NET, in fact I have some preferences over C# with it. I am really looking forward to the VB.NET “catch-up” for VB 10. One thing I noticed that C# had a lot of syntactic sugar that VB.NET lacked, like auto properties. The killer for me right now is that a lambda expression must be a Function instead of a Sub.

I have a new appreciation for VB.NET and VB.NET developers. Maybe I’ll do a code camp or user group presentation in it once :-).

2 thoughts on “C# and VB.NET

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *